top of page

Bombay High Court Clarifies Definition of Outraging Modesty

Writer's picture: Legal Thikana Legal Thikana

The Bombay High Court has ruled that merely pulling a woman's hair or pushing her during a quarrel does not amount to outraging her modesty, as there must be a clear intention to do so.

In a recent case, the court refused to direct the Mumbai Police to invoke section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against five men accused of assaulting a couple. The judges noted that the allegations against the men did not meet the criteria for outraging modesty, as there was no intention to do so.


Key Points:

- Merely pulling hair or pushing a woman during a quarrel does not amount to outraging her modesty.


- There must be a clear intention to outrage modesty.


- Every case of quarrel cannot become an outraging of modesty case.


- The victim must specifically state what was done to outrage her modesty.


Court's Observation:

- "How does criminal force mean outraging modesty... Can mere use of criminal force outrage modesty? Where is the intention?"


- "Pulling hair is not outraging modesty at all. There has to be some intention to outrage the modesty."


- "Suppose if there is a quarrel or a fight, then it is obvious someone will pull hair of the woman or may push her. But that cannot qualify as outraging modesty of the woman."

Comments


bottom of page