top of page
Writer's pictureLegal Thikana

Bombay High Court Clarifies Definition of Outraging Modesty

The Bombay High Court has ruled that merely pulling a woman's hair or pushing her during a quarrel does not amount to outraging her modesty, as there must be a clear intention to do so.

In a recent case, the court refused to direct the Mumbai Police to invoke section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against five men accused of assaulting a couple. The judges noted that the allegations against the men did not meet the criteria for outraging modesty, as there was no intention to do so.


Key Points:

- Merely pulling hair or pushing a woman during a quarrel does not amount to outraging her modesty.


- There must be a clear intention to outrage modesty.


- Every case of quarrel cannot become an outraging of modesty case.


- The victim must specifically state what was done to outrage her modesty.


Court's Observation:

- "How does criminal force mean outraging modesty... Can mere use of criminal force outrage modesty? Where is the intention?"


- "Pulling hair is not outraging modesty at all. There has to be some intention to outrage the modesty."


- "Suppose if there is a quarrel or a fight, then it is obvious someone will pull hair of the woman or may push her. But that cannot qualify as outraging modesty of the woman."

17 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page